Hostinger vs Bluehost
There’s a strange sensation that I’d like to address. Despite discussing Hostinger and Bluehost extensively on this channel, I’ve never conducted a head-to-head comparison. So, let’s get started because I’ll be analyzing their performance and technologies, pricing structures, support services, additional features, and more to determine which provider is ideal for certain types of websites and users. Hold tight!
1. Pricing Differences
Hostinger’s most affordable single shared hosting plan costs only $0.99 per month, which comes down to a total of $47.52 for a 4-year plan. In contrast, Bluehost’s cheapest plan is priced at around $2.95 per month, with a maximum duration of 3 years, which amounts to a total of $106. On average, Bluehost tends to be about 50% to 55% more expensive than Hostinger at each tier. This is because Bluehost is an older company that heavily invests in marketing, resulting in a premium on top of their regular pricing.
However, there is a rumor about an ancient prophecy that speaks of the chosen one who will utilize the discount codes in the description and save a significant amount of money. But, jokes aside, you can benefit from an additional 10% discount on Hostinger plans, which can be combined with other promotions, or get a discount when purchasing Bluehost plans by using the links below.
But, in the interest of full transparency, I want to let you know that I earn a commission whenever you use those links to make a purchase. This is how I monetize this YouTube channel, and it enables me to continue creating content full time while remaining impartial in my reviews of web hosting providers. So, check out the links below to get the biggest available discounts online.
By going with Bluehost, you not only get a web hosting service but also a free domain name with their cheapest plan. On the other hand, Hostinger provides a free domain only with their more expensive plans. However, if you choose to buy a domain name separately with Hostinger, it will still be more than twice as affordable than with Bluehost. It’s a minor inconvenience, but the savings are significant.
2. Performance Tests
These two web hosting providers diverge in significant ways. Hostinger is a cheaper option but prioritizes performance, utilizing Litespeed servers, PHP 7.4, HTTP/2, and SSD storage on the Google Cloud Platform. Bluehost, in contrast, focuses more on features and hasn’t updated its performance technology since 2017. To compare their performance, I created empty WordPress websites with both providers and installed a free caching plugin on Bluehost to even the playing field. Hostinger’s $1 plan loaded the empty website in 1.2 seconds, while Bluehost took 2.9 seconds, showing its older technology. However, in a simulated user test, Hostinger struggled to handle 50 users at once, while Bluehost had no problems.
Overall, Hostinger plans are around twice as fast as Bluehost’s on average. Still, Hostinger’s $1 plans limit user count to maintain their speedy performance, whereas Bluehost does not. If you have a substantial number of users, you shouldn’t rely on the cheapest plan, and in that case, speed matters more than user capacity.
3. Support Options
Bluehost comes out on top in terms of customer support, with free 24/7 live chat, phone, and email support available. Hostinger, on the other hand, currently has its live chat feature disabled and only offers email support. However, they do provide a comprehensive knowledge base with detailed articles and step-by-step instructions that are regularly updated, and can be accessed even without purchasing a plan. Hostinger does plan to bring back free 24/7 live chat support in the future. It’s worth noting that the accuracy of the answers provided by customer support agents can vary depending on the individual. The author had a better experience with Hostinger, but these were isolated incidents and may not be representative of everyone’s experience.
4. Extra Features
One notable advantage that Hostinger offers is the ability to choose the data center where your website files will be stored. This feature is significant because the closer your website is to your users, the faster the information will travel. Hostinger has servers in various parts of the world, including Europe, Asia, and the United States, while Bluehost only has data centers on the east and west coasts of the United States. This means that if you plan to target a global audience, Hostinger is the better choice.
On the other hand, Bluehost has some unique advantages when it comes to managing your website, such as automatic WordPress updates (which became less necessary after WordPress 5.5) and the ability to create a copy of your website and test changes before releasing them to the public. Additionally, Bluehost provides consultations and tools to help you manage your business, making it a suitable choice if you want to focus on growing your business in the US market.
Overall, Hostinger’s features are more focused on speed and performance, making it an excellent option for hosting international websites, while Bluehost is more business-focused and can help you better manage your operations and growth.
Taking all factors into consideration, it’s important to determine which hosting provider would best suit your needs. Hostinger would be a great choice for those looking for a low-priced option with great performance, especially if you want to choose the data center location. However, managing your website and business will be solely up to you without much external support. On the other hand, Bluehost is suitable for beginners who want guidance with their digital strategy. Although their performance may not be top-of-the-line, customer acquisition is crucial in the early stages of starting a business.
If you have already decided on a hosting provider, you can find the best available discounts by using the links in the description. Wishing you all the best with your business and website endeavors!